The connections that span generations
ROOT & GENEALOGY

Document an unsuccessful search

Finding nothing is useful when the search scope is known. It prevents repetition and supports choosing another source without prematurely denying an event.

Reading a register with a verification notebook. Illustration; fictional scene, not documentary evidence.
Reading a register with a verification notebook. Illustration; fictional scene, not documentary evidence.AI-generated illustration · ROOT & GENEALOGY

The method, step by step

  1. Log repository, collection, reference, locality, period, search system and access date. Online, preserve terms and filters; in a register, the images or pages examined.
  2. Check that the years exist, the record is complete and the collection covers the correct jurisdiction. Mark gaps, unreadable pages and access restrictions.
  3. Distinguish no index hit from absence after reading a series. Test name variants, nearby dates and relevant places, recording each expansion.
  4. Write a bounded conclusion: not found in this register, period and method. Then select a complementary source or ask the repository about gaps.

Worked exercise · fictional data

No birth found: define what was actually searched

Fictional exercise: a family letter places Louise’s birth around 1874 in a commune. An online name search finds nothing. First ask which sources cover this birth before concluding that a record is missing.

Starting records

Undated family letter
“Louise was born around 1874, in the village.” This sentence does not name the village.
Index search
No exact-name result; index coverage unchecked.
Register table examined
Years 1873–1875 browsed; no entry retained.
Repository finding aid
Still to consult for volumes, gaps and commune jurisdiction.

How to analyse the records

  1. Log the unsuccessful search: resource, consultation date, spellings, commune and years. “Nothing found online” describes neither scope nor limits.
  2. Separate indexing from preservation. If this commune’s 1874 births are not indexed, the name search has not tested the record’s existence. Consult the finding aid and images; an index omission is not a register omission.
  3. Check page continuity and expected years. A table may be incomplete or in a separate volume. Record a missing year as a gap instead of claiming the whole period was searched.
  4. Widen one variable at a time: another spelling, a period supported by marriage or death ages, then a nearby commune if a record places the family there. Log every extension to avoid repeating searches.

What these records support

A proportionate conclusion is “no entry retained in this commune’s table for 1873–1875; index coverage and register continuity still to check”. This does not show Louise was born elsewhere. The letter remains a lead needing a more precise place and date from a record closer to the event.

Compare the letter with a marriage or death naming the birthplace. Keep unsuccessful searches and their limits in the journal.

Compare two observations →

Record in your research log

  • Collection
  • coverage
  • gaps
  • query
  • browsed pages
  • date.
Research log →

A useful next action

Compare two observations →

Sources & references

Dates below apply to each resource, not an exhaustive check of its collections. Read the limits and official pages before requesting records or visiting.